|
Isotope/ Isomer
|
Target
|
Ion Source
|
Exp. Program
|
Min. Req. Yield (at exp.)
|
Comment on Estbl. Yield
|
Exp. Area (LE, ME, HE)
|
Prop./Loi
|
EEC Priority
|
Dvlpmt Priority
|
Planned Development
|
Individual Results
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
year
|
plan
|
|||||||||||
| F18g | SiC | FEBIAD | ASTRO | 1.00e+7 | average of #16,#17,#20,#32 | ME | S1123 | M | 2 | 2016 | Febiad Optimization | |
Beam Development Details
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Proton Number | 9 | Atomic Mass Number | 18 |
| Isomer Number | 0 | Min. Req. Intensity at Exp. | 1.00e+7 |
| Target Options | SiC | Ion Source Options | FEBIAD |
| Comment On Yield | average of #16,#17,#20,#32 | Exp. Facility | DRAGON |
| Exp. Area | ME | Proposal L.O.I | S1123 |
| Last Update | 11/30/2016 | Proposal L.O.I Date | 11/30/2011 |
| EEC Priority | M | Development Priority | 2 |
| Development Year | 2016 | Development Category | B |
| Development Plan | Febiad Optimization | Development Status | |
| Development Requirement | yield, FEBIAD | Internal Comment | |
Comment
|
|||
| modif. FEBIAD electrode bias should make yields from SiC#16 reproducable; first testst to increase yield by bleeding in Al(CH3)3 gas were not promising | |||